Making erotic images using Flux AI



I have made over 3,600 images of sexy demons, aka succubi, using Flux AI, specifically Flux1.1 pro ultra portrait. Before this, I used Meta AI, but I gave it away after it went bad in November 2024. Maybe it is a case of getting what you pay for. I am impressed with Flux. The images are 2048x2048 and very close to photo quality. They are perhaps better described as hyper-realistic. Using Flux I get a much better hit rate of pretty faces than with the pre-update Meta, whose images look crude by comparison. The keeper rate with the old Meta was about one in 20, with Flux it is more like 50%.

Occasionally I get topless ladies, though hardly ever with nipples. The down-side is that Flux is pricey. I paid $33 AUD to get 126 images that were worth keeping. The image at right is one I consider beautiful. I added the bare breasts.

Flux is OK drawing eyes, but not so good with fingers. These often look like long sharpened pencils, sometimes absurdly long. Often there are six instead of five fingers. It also has trouble with legs, often not bothering to draw the second leg or bending a leg unnaturally.

As a test, I made 50 images with the prompt: "A stunning horned succubus, aged 33, sits outside in the sun, on a pedestal with a fantasy palace in the background, dressed in an filigree long white see-through lace gown. She is topless. Her jet black hair cascades down her back as she reveals her bra-less figure, wearing long black net stay-up stockings and a garter belt. Elaborate gold jewelry adorned with precious stones. Her legs are spread wide, she pulls her top open. She wears stilettos. Show her breasts. Show her nipples."

The results: all were worth keeping, 30 were nice looking, 17 were pretty, and 2 were beautiful. Six were topless, and of these, two had proper nipples. Five had an extra or a malformed leg. 18 showed stocking tops.

Here are succubi I made using Flux AI. I have also tried Gemini, which is free, but not quite as good as Flux.
Tad Boniecki
Updated April 2025